Insect-Derived Enzyme Fights Inflammation
by Vitamin Research Products Inc. 2001
Our bodies have a love-hate
relationship with inflammation. On the one hand, inflammation
is a natural response, necessary to protect the body from invading
organisms. On the other hand, inflammation can limit joint
function, and destroy bone, cartilage and other articular structures.
An elusive goal of
scientists and physicians has been to find a side-effect-free
substance to reduce the pain and inflammation associated with
fibrocystic breast disease, rheumatoid arthritis, idiopathic
edema, carpal tunnel syndrome and post-operative swelling.
It appears that the search may be nearing an end, thanks to
an enzyme Serrapeptase produced
by the larval form of the silk moth.
Serrapeptase is an
enzyme that is produced in the intestines of silk worms to
break down cocoon walls. This enzyme is proving to be a superior
alternative to the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAIDs)
traditionally used to treat rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis.
Its uses have also been extended to the treatment of chronic
sinusitis and postoperative inflammation, and some researchers
believe the substance can play an important role in arterial
plaque prevention and removal.
Harmful Effects of NSAIDs
NSAIDs, which include
aspirin, ibuprofen, salicylates, and naproxen, are among the
most commonly prescribed medications for inflammation resulting
from rheumatoid arthritis, joint conditions, osteoarthritis,
gouty arthritis, joint and muscle discomfort associated with
systemic lupus erythematosus, and other musculoskeletal disorders.(1) In
some cases, this overeliance on NSAIDs has proved deadly. Annually,
76,000 people are hospitalized from NSAID-induced gastrointestinal
complications. The American Medical Association estimates that
from 50-80 percent of those hospitalized for gastrointestinal
bleeding are taking some form of NSAIDs. At this stage in the
medication-induced bleeding, there is a ten percent chance
of fatality.(2)
NSAIDs lethal effects
result from the inhibition of the biosynthesis of prostaglandins.
NSAIDs block cyclo-oxygenase, the enzyme responsible for catalyzing
the reactions of arachidonic acid to endoperoxide compounds.
This process results in the inhibition of gastric prostaglandin
E, a hormone which protects the lining of the stomach from
acid. After prolonged and frequent ingestion of NSAIDs, the
stomach remains defenseless and at increased susceptibility
to ulcers.(3-4) If an ulcer erodes
into a blood vessel, bleeding results. An ulcer can destroy
part of the stomach and duodenal walls, leaving a gap that
requires immediate surgery.
In one study, 1,826
osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis patients who had been
taking NSAIDs for six months or more and who had been unable
to tolerate continuous NSAID use because of adverse gastrointestinal
symptoms were examined endoscopically for gastroduodenal lesions
and ulcers. Clinically significant gastroduodenal lesions were
found in 37.1 percent of the patients. Of those, 24 percent
had ulcers. The prevalence of gastroduodenal ulcers increased
with age, duration of osteoarthritis, and duration of current
NSAID use. The authors of the study wrote: "These results
provide further endoscopic confirmation of the association
between NSAID use and gastroduodenal lesions and ulcers and
support the contention that safer treatment alternatives to
conventional NSAIDs are required."(5)
That advice is particularly
wise in light of the other effects NSAIDs have on the gastrointestinal
tract. In one group of 312 NSAID takers, 20 percent had levels
of inflammation comparable to that previously reported in patients
with inflammatory bowel disease.(6) Besides
damaging the gastrointestinal tract, NSAIDs also interfere
with and suppress bone repair and remodeling. One paper presented
data obtained over a 12-year period, and outlined the effects
of NSAIDs on the matrix synthesis and turnover in 650 arthritic
and 180 non-arthritic human cartilages. The study showed that
one category of NSAIDs that includes Naproxen, ibuprofen, indomethacin,
and nimezulide significantly inhibited matrix synthesis and
had toxic effects on cartilage metabolism.(7) Thus,
it appears that the drugs many patients take to relieve their
arthritic pains actually contributes to further destruction
of their joints!
Additionally, NSAIDs
have been shown to interfere with patients' sleep patterns.
One study of 37 male and female subjects at the sleep laboratory
at Bowling Green State University in Ohio demonstrated that
aspirin and ibuprofen, in comparison to a placebo, increased
the number of awakenings and the percentage of time spent awake.
The drugs also decreased sleep efficiency, and delayed the
onset of the deeper stages of sleep.(8)
Even insulin secretion
is affected by NSAIDs. Neonatal rat pancreatic cells were examined
partly to determine the effects of insulin secretion caused
by prostaglandin E (PGE) and drugs that inhibit its synthesisói.e.
NSAIDs. Two NSAIDs, sodium salicylate (aspirin) and ibuprofen,
at drug concentrations similar to those achieved therapeutically
in humans, inhibited PGE synthesis up to 70-80 percent. Augmented
insulin secretion accompanied the PGE inhibition. Both drugs
shifted the glucose-insulin response curves to the left at
low glucose concentrations and augmented maximal insulin release
at high glucose concentrations.(9)
Other NSAID-induced
side effects include kidney damage, blood dyscrasias and cardiovascular
effects, complication of antihypertensive therapies involving
diuretics or beta-adrenoceptor blockade, and adverse effects
in patients with heart failure and cirrhosis.(10) In
one instance, a woman treated for rheumatoid arthritis with
the NSAID sulindac developed gallstones composed of sulindac
metabolites.(11)
Interestingly, NSAIDs
have also induced adverse psychiatric reactions. Five psychiatric
outpatientsótwo with major depressive disorders, one
with a bipolar disorder, one with a schizophrenic disorder
and one with an anxiety disorderówere treated with NSAIDs
due to rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, or other painful
neuromuscular conditions. All five patients developed moderate
to severe depression. Three patients became paranoid, and four
either attempted or considered suicide. These psychiatric symptoms
disappeared once the patients stopped taking NSAIDs. When the
patients re-started the drugs, the symptoms returned.(12)
NSAID s Roulette
Due to the detrimental
effects of NSAIDs on the body, most physicians resort to a
game of "NSAID musical-chairs," taking a patient
off one NSAID as soon as side effects become evident or the
drug stops working, then treating the patient with another
of the 10 most widely prescribed propionic acid-derived NSAIDs.
To provide a more consistent
form of treatment, researchers have long searched for a side-effect
free anti-inflammatory agent. Researchers have recently focused
on selective cyclo-oxygenase (COX-2) inhibitors, more precise
versions of NSAIDs. Whereas previous NSAIDs reduced inflammation
by inhibiting all cyclo-oxygenase activity, these new selective
COX-2 inhibitors differentiate between the two forms of COX:
COX-1 appears to regulate many normal physiologic functions
and COX-2 mediates the inflammatory response. These selective
inhibitors are believed to reduce inflammation without influencing
normal physiologic functions by inhibiting only COX-2. By leaving
COX-1 alone, the selective inhibitors result in fewer gastrointestinal
side effects.
At first glance, these
COX-2 inhibitors look like the solution to NSAID complications.
Upon further inspection, however, celecoxib, a highly selective
COX-2 inhibitor, can cause headaches, change in bowel habits,
abdominal discomfort and dizziness in osteoarthritis patients.
Fewer adverse effects are reported in rheumatoid arthritis
patients, but because the drug is metabolized in the liver
by cytochrome P-450 isozyme CYP2C9, serious drug interactions
are possible. Fung and colleagues pointed out that more clinical
studies are needed before the selective COX-2 inhibitors are
put into widespread use.(13)
Another new drug, Enbrel,
initially showed promise of treating the pain associated with
rheumatoid arthritis. Currently, however, the FDA is advising
physicians about safety concerns of the new drug. Thirty of
the 25,000 patients treated with Enbrel since the drug's approval
have developed serious infections, including sepsis. Several
of those patients died as a result of the infections. Those
at greatest risk when taking Enbrel appear to be patients with
a history of chronic or recurrent infections, pre-existing
infections, diabetes, or other conditions making them more
susceptible to infection.(14)
The potentially lethal
side effects associated with NSAIDs and other drugs indicate
that a superior anti-inflammatory substance is needed.
A Natural Anti-Inflammatory
Serrapeptase, also
known as Serratia peptidase, is a proteolytic enzyme isolated
from the non-pathogenic enterobacteria Serratia E15. When consumed
in unprotected tablets or capsules, the enzyme is destroyed
by acid in the stomach. However, enterically-coated tablets
enable the enzyme to pass through the stomach unchanged, and
be absorbed in the intestine. Serrapeptase is found in negligible
amounts in the urine, suggesting that it is transported directly
from the intestine into the bloodstream.(15,16)
Clinical studies show
that serrapeptase induces fibrinolytic, anti-inflammatory and
anti-edemic (prevents swelling and fluid retention) activity
in a number of tissues, and that its anti-inflammatory effects
are superior to other proteolytic enzymes.(17)
Besides reducing inflammation,
one of serrapeptase's most profound benefits is reduction of
pain, due to its ability to block the release of pain-inducing
amines from inflamed tissues.(18) Physicians
throughout Europe and Asia have recognized the anti-inflammatory
and pain-blocking benefits of this naturally occurring substance
and are using it in treatment as an alternative to salicylates,
ibuprofen and other NSAIDs.(19)
In Germany and other
European countries, serrapeptase is a common treatment for
inflammatory and traumatic swellings, and much of the research
that exists on this substance is of European origin. One double-blind
study was conducted by German researchers to determine the
effect of serrapeptase on post-operative swelling and pain.
This study involved sixty-six patients who were treated surgically
for fresh rupture of the lateral collateral ligament of the
knee. On the third post-operative day, the group receiving
serrapeptase exhibited a 50 percent reduction of swelling,
compared to the controls. The patients receiving serrapeptase
also became more rapidly pain-free than the controls, and by
the tenth day, the pain had disappeared completely.(20)
Cystic Breast Disease
Serrapeptase has also
been used in the successful treatment of fibrocystic breast
disease. In a double-blind study, 70 patients complaining of
breast engorgement randomly were divided into a treatment group
and a placebo group. Serrapeptase was superior to the placebo
for improvement of breast pain, breast swelling and induration
(firmness). 85.7 percent of the patients receiving serrapeptase
reported moderate to marked improvement. No adverse reactions
to serrapeptase were reported and the researchers concluded
that "serrapeptase is a safe and effective method for
the treatment of breast engorgement."(21,22)
Serrapeptase and Sinusitis
Due to its inflammatory
properties, serrapeptase has been shown in clinical studies
to benefit chronic sinusitis sufferers. In this condition,
the mucus in patientsí nasal cavities is thickened and
hypersecreted. This thickening causes mucus to be expelled
less frequently. Japanese researchers evaluated the effects
of serratiopeptidase (30 mg/day orally for four weeks) on the
elasticity and viscosity of the nasal mucus in adult patients
with chronic sinusitis. Serratiopeptidase reduced the viscosity
of the mucus, improving the elimination of bronchopulmonary
secretions.(23)
Other clinical trials
support serrapeptase's ability to relieve the problems associated
with chronic sinusitis. In one study, 140 patients with acute
or chronic ear, nose and throat pathologies were evaluated
with either a placebo or the active serratia peptidase. Patients
taking the serrapeptase experienced a significant reduction
in severity of pain, amount of secretion, purulence of secretions,
difficulty in swallowing, nasal dysphonia, nasal obstruction,
anosmia, and body temperature after three to four days and
at the end of treatment. Patients suffering from laryngitis,
catarrhal rhinopharyngitis and sinusitis who were treated with
serrapeptase experienced a significant and rapid improvement
of symptoms after 3-4 days. Physicians assessed efficacy of
treatment as excellent or good for 97.3 percent of patients
treated with serrapeptase compared with only 21.9 percent of
those treated with a placebo.(24)
Respiratory diseases
are characterized by increased production of a more dense mucus
modified in viscosity and elasticity. Traditionally, in respiratory
diseases, muco-active drugs are prescribed to reestablish the
physicochemical characteristics of the mucus in order to restore
respiratory function. Some of these drugs, however, cause a
functional depletion of mucus, whereas Serrapeptase alters
the elasticity of mucus without depleting it.(25,27)
A powerful agent by
itself, serrapeptase teamed with antibiotics delivers increased
concentrations of the antimicrobial agent to the site of the
infection. Bacteria often endure a process called biofilm formation,
which results in resistance to antimicrobial agents. In an
attempt to prevent this bacterial immunity, researchers have
experimented with various means of inhibiting biofilm-embedded
bacteria. Their search may have ended with serrapeptase. One
study conducted by Italian researchers suggests that proteolytic
enzymes could significantly enhance the activities of antibiotics
against biofilms. Antibiotic susceptibility tests showed that
serratiopeptidase greatly enhances the activity of the antibiotic,
ofloxacin, and that it can inhibit biofilm formation.(28)
Another double-blind
randomized study evaluated the effects of administering the
antibiotic cephalexin in conjunction with serrapeptase or a
placebo to 93 patients suffering from either perennial rhinitis,
chronic rhinitis with sinusitis or chronic relapsing bronchitis.
The serratia peptidase treated group experienced significant
improvement in rhinorrhea, nasal stuffiness, coryza and improvement
of the para-nasal sinus shadows.(29)
Researchers witnessed
equally impressive results in the treatment of infections in
lung cancer patients undergoing thoracotomy. Serrapeptase and
cefotiam, an antibiotic with a broad spectrum of activity against
both Gram-positive and Gram-negative microorganisms, were administered
to 35 thoracotomy patients with lung cancer. The patients were
divided into two groups. A single dose of cefotiam was administered
to the 17 subjects in Group I. The 18 subjects in Group II
received a combination of Cefotiam and serrapeptase. The level
of the antibiotic in the tissues versus the blood was significantly
higher in the serrapeptase group than the single dose group.(30)
Cardiovascular Implications
Hans A. Nieper, M.D.,
an internist from Hannover, Germany, studied the effects of
serrapeptase on plaque accumulations in the arteries. The formation
of plaque involves deposits of fatty substances, cholesterol,
cellular waste products, calcium and fibrin (a clotting material
in the blood) on the inner lining of the arteries. Excessive
plaque results in partial or complete blockage of the blood's
flow through an artery, resulting in arteriosclerosis, or hardening
of the arteries, and an ensuing stroke or heart attack. The
evidence to support serrapeptase's role in preventing plaque
build-up is anecdotal. Still, further studies are called for
in this area as Nieper's research indicated that the protein-dissolving
action of serrapeptase will gradually break down atherosclerotic
plaques.(31)
Conclusion
Regardless of whether
serrapeptase is used for inflammatory diseases or to prevent
plaque build up on the arteries, it is well-tolerated. Due
to its lack of side effects and anti-inflammatory capabilities,
serrapeptase is a logical choice to replace harmful NSAIDs.
Thanks to the tiny larvae of the silk moth, researchers have
taken a large step toward finding relief for inflammatory disease
sufferers.
References
-
Raskin JB. Gastrointestinal effects of
nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory therapy. Am J Med. 1999;
106 (5B):3S-12S.
-
No author listed. Regular Use of Pain Relievers
Can Have Dangerous Results. Kaleidoscope Interactive News,
American Medical Association media briefing. July 24, 1997.
-
Fung HB, Kirschenbaum, HL. Selective cyclooxygenase-2
inhibitors for the treatment of arthritis. Clin Ther. 1999;
21(7):1131-57.
-
Geis GS. Update on clinical developments
with celecoxib, a new specific COX-2 inhibitor: what can
we expect? Scand J Rheumatol Suppl. 1999; 109:31-7.
-
Cheatum DE, Arvanitakis C, Gumpel M, Stead
H, Geis GS. An endoscopic study of gastroduodenal lesions
induced by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Clin Ther.
1999; 21(6):992-1003.
-
Tibble JA, Sigthorsson G, Foster R, Scott
D, Fagerhol MK, Roseth A, Bjarnason I. High prevalence
of NSAID enteropathy as shown by a simple faecal test.
Gut. 1999; 45(3):362-6.
-
Dingle JT. The effects of NSAID on the
matrix of human articular cartilages. Z Rheumatol. 1999;
58(3):125-9.
-
Murphy PJ, Badia P, Myers BL, Boecker MR,
Wright KP Jr. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs affect
normal sleep patterns in humans. Physiol Behav. 1994; 55(6):1063-6.
-
Metz SA, Robertson RP, Fujimoto WY. Inhibition
of prostaglandin E synthesis augments glucose-induced insulin
secretion in cultured pancreas. Diabetes. 1981; 30(7):551-7.
-
Raskin JB. Gastrointestinal effects of
nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory therapy. Am J Med. 1999;
106 (5B):3S-12S.
-
Tokumine F, Sunagawa T, Shiohira Y, Nakamoto
T, Miyazato F, Muto Y. Drug-associated cholelithiasis:
a case of sulindac stone formation and the incorporation
of sulindac metabolites into the gallstones. Am J Gastroenterol.
1999;94(8):2285-8.
-
Jiang HK, Chang DM. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory
drugs with adverse psychiatric reactions: five case reports.
Clin Rheumatol. 1999;18(4):339-45.
-
Fung HB, Kirschenbaum, HL. Selective cyclooxygenase-2
inhibitors for the treatment of arthritis. Clin Ther. 1999;
21(7):1131-57.
-
FDA MedWatch: The FDA Medical Products
Reporting Program. May 12, 1999. FDA Talk Paper.
-
Moriya N, Nakata M, Nakamura M, Takaoka
M, Iwasa S, Kato K, Kakinuma A. Intestinal absorption of
serrapeptase (TSP) in rats. Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 1994;
20(Pt1):101-8.
-
Miyata, K. Intestinal absorption of Serratia
Peptidase. J Appl Biochem. 1980;2:111-16.
-
Mazzone A, Catalani M, Costanzo M, Drusian
A, Mandoli A, Russo S, Guarini E, Vesperini G. Evaluation
of Serratia peptidase in acute or chronic inflammation
of otorhinolaryngology pathology: a multicentre, double-blind,
randomized trial versus placebo. J Int Med Res. 1990; 18(5):379-88.
-
Mazzone A, et al. Evaluation of Serratia
peptidase in acute or chronic inflammation of otorhinolaryngology
pathology: a multicentre, double-blind, randomized trial
versus placebo. J Int Med Res. 1990; 18(5):379-88.
-
Aso T et al. Breast engorgement and its
treatment: Clinical effects of Danzen an anti-inflammatory
enzyme preparation. The world of Obstetrics and Gynecology
(Japanese). 1981; 33:371-9.
-
Esch PM, Gerngross H, Fabian A. Reduction
of postoperative swelling. Objective measurement of swelling
of the upper ankle joint in treatment with serrapeptase-a
prospective study (German). Fortschr Med. 1989;107(4):67-8,
71-2.
-
Kee WH, Tan SL, Lee V, Salmon YM. The treatment
of breast engorgement with Serrapeptase (Danzen): a randomized
double-blind controlled trial. Singapore Med J. 1989;30(1):48-54.
-
Aso T et al. Breast engorgement and its
treatment: Clinical effects of Danzen an anti-inflammatory
enzyme preparation. The world of Obstetrics and Gynecology
(Japanese). 1981; 33:371-9.
-
Majima Y, Inagaki M, Hirata K, Takeuchi
K, Morishita A, Sakakura Y. The effect of an orally administered
proteolytic enzyme on the elasticity and viscosity of nasal
mucus. Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1988;244(6):355-9.
-
Mazzone A, et al. Evaluation of Serratia
peptidase in acute or chronic inflammation of otorhinolaryngology
pathology: a multicentre, double-blind, randomized trial
versus placebo. J Int Med Res. 1990; 18(5):379-88.
-
Tomoda K, and Miyatam K. Some information
on the composition of trachael secretions before and after
the administration of Danzen. Exper Ther. 1972; 477:9-16.
-
Kase Y, et al. A new method for evaluating
mucolytic expectorant activity and its application to two
proteolytic enzymes, serratiopeptidase and seaprose. Arznelrnitteltorachung.
1982; 32:374-378.
-
Marriott C. Modification in the rheological
properties of mucus by drugs. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1982; 144:75-84.
-
Selan L, Berlutti F, Passariello C, Comodi-Ballanti
MR, Thaller MC. Proteolytic enzymes: a new treatment strategy
for prosthetic infections? Antimicrob Agents Chemother.
1993; 37(12):2618-21.
-
Perna L. Osservazionl Clniche sui traitamento
in osppio cleco con Serratio peptidasl nella neifre perenna
naila ninite cronica nacutizzata con sinusopattia, nella
bronchia cronica nacutizzata. Rlv Pat Clin Tuberc Penumol.
1985; 56:509-516.
-
Koyama A, Mori J, Tokuda H, Waku M, Anno
H, Katayama T, Murakami K, Komatsu H, Hirata M, Arai T,
et al. Augmentation by serrapeptase of tissue permeation
by cefotiam (Japanese). Jpn J Antibiot. 1986; 39(3):761-71.
-
Brewer Science Library website. 1999.